Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Discord
Share on Telegram
ECOSYSTEM SCORE
ECOSYSTEM SCORE
The score reflects the overall worthiness of the blockchain's ecosystem, as determined by regular monitoring and collective reviewing of the ecosystem.
ECOSYSTEM SCORE
ALERTS
Service CoinGecko API seems has been resolved on 17 Sep
Service CoinGecko API seems to be down on 17 Sep
Service CoinGecko API incident has been resolved
Service CoinGecko API seems to be down
Service CoinGecko API incident has been resolved on 21 Aug
Service CoinGecko API seems to be down on 21 Aug
Service CoinGecko API seems to be down
Service CoinGecko API incident has been resolved
Service CoinGecko API issue is resolved
Service CoinGecko API seems to be down
REVIEW NOTES
Documentation score is increased as API documentation are added
The third-party score was increased as Stellar cloud platform was added.
Foundational tools score is decreased due to SDKs and programming languages
Foundation tools score is increased as SDKs are added
The ecosystem score decreased due to low compatability of SDKs.
Developer community score is increased as new data has been added.
The ecosystem score decreased due to low compatability of Programming Language Support.
Ecosystem score increased due to availabilitiy of documentation.
Foundation tool score has increased as Flutter SDK was added.
Foundation tool score has increased as Scala SDK was added.
Foundation score increases due to introduction of GO and C++ implementation.
Increasing Performance score because Node count has been added
Increasing Foundation tools score because Essintials tools and SDKs added
Decreasing documantion score because Skeleton code is not available
Foundation tools increases by essential tools, programming languages and sdks
Add-Ons are decreases by security auditing tool
Third party services increases by oracle integration and cloud provider
Perfomance score increased as read-write speed, gas fee and node count is available.
Documentation score increased as skeleton node and node validator are available.
Grant Program score decreased due to unavailability of Grant Data and Paid to Developers.
ADD-ONS score must be increased as Dao is added
Protocol Support score increased due to availability of Email, Chat and Ticketing System.
Updaing Performence data because nodes count has been added
Increasing Foundation tool score because SDKs has been updated
Increasing grant score no of developers and grant data has been added
Foundation tools decreases by essential tools, programming language support and sdks
Increasing Third party score manage API data has been added
Foundation tool score decreases due to addition of dosen't exist programming language.
SDK count decreased and Grant total is been decreased
Documentation score must be increased as all information is present
Adoption score increased as number of developers has increased.
Add-Ons score increased due to Plugins.
Foundation tools score is increased as new Programming Languages were added
Documentation score decreased due to no official skeleton code.
Third-party services score increased as Chainlink integrated with Moonbeam.
Add-Ons score increased due to Bridges.
FOUNDATIONAL TOOLS score decreased due to addition of new SDKS ie., Unity SDK
Documentation score is decreased as validator nodes doesn't exist
3rd party services score decreased as cloud provider doesn't exist
Add-ons is decreased due to no data of Intellij and VSCode
Documentaion increases by their existance
Add-Ons decreases by security auditing tools
Add-Ons score increased due to availability of Dao.
Third-party service score has increased due to Oracle Integration, Managed API and Cloud Provider.
Protocol Support score increased due to Email, Chat support and Ticketing System.
Protocol Support score decreased due to Email and Slack support.
The ecosystem score Increased due to availability of Protocol Support.
Ecosystem score Increased due to availability of Protocol Support.
Foundation Tools score is increased as Flutter SDK is added.
Foundation Tools score is increased as Flutter SDK is added.
Ecosystem Score increased due to addition of Protocol Support data
Ecosystem Score has increased due to availability of Protocol Support
Ecosystem Score has increased due to availability of Protocol Support
Documentation Score Decreased due to not availability of Node Setup & Validators
Documentaion Score decreased due to unavailability of Skeleton Code.
Foundation tools score decreases due to addition of doesn't exist programming language.
Add-Ons score increased as swapping tools were added.
Adoption score increased as GitHub commits were added.
The documentation score is increased as validator nodes are added.
Data transfer from Protocol support to Add-ons, Hence score increased.
Data transfer from Protocol support to Add-ons, Hence score increased.
Ecosystem score decreases with respect to Foundation tools score.
Ecosystem score decreases with respect to Foundation tools score.
Add-Ons score increased
Protocol Support score increased
Grant Program score has decreased due to unavailability of Grant data.
Grant total increased due to protocol support.
Add-Ons score decreased due to insufficient information.
Thirds Party services score increased due to Cloud Provider, Oracle Integration and Managed API.
Adoption score increased due to data verification.
Add ons score decreased due to insufficient information
Add-Ons score increased due to launch of bridge.
Adoption score has increased as github commits were added.
Third Party Sevices Score increased as Cloud Provider is added.
Foundation score increased due to introduction of Glow language.
Foundation Tools score is increased as programming languages are added.
Protocol score decreased due to read-only slack channel.
Add-ons score is increased due to the introduction of DAO.
Add-Ons score decreased due to insufficient data.
Foudational tools score decreased due to insufficient data
Community score decreased due to hidden Telegram online members.
Performance score is decreased due to error in Uptime.
Ecosystem score Increased due to availability of Protocol Support.
Performance score is decreased due to error in Uptime.
Documentation Score has decreasd due to unavailability of Skeleton Code
Documentation score is increased as skeleten code is added
Add-ons score increased due to addition of library from VSCode, Intellij, etc.
Adoption score increased by fetching data like developer, repository, etc.
Ecosystem Score is decreased due to unavailability of Grant Program.
Ecosystem Score is decreased due to unavailability of Grant Program
Documentation score increased as skeleton node, node validator is available
Protocol Support score has increased as Email,chat and ticketing system has added
Protocol Support score has increased as Email,chat and ticketing system has added
Documentation score increased as skeleton node, node validator is available
Documentation score increased as skeleton node, node validator is available
Protocol Support score has increased as Email,chat and ticketing system has added
Protocol Support score increased due to Email Support.
Adoption score is increased as number of developers count increased.
Foundation Tools score increased due to new programming languages.
DOCUMENTATION score increased due to addition of skeletion code item
PERFORMANCE
PERFORMANCE
The score depicts the network's performance rating based on metrics like avg TPS, nodes, gas fees, and uptime.
PERFORMANCE
60
1
4,960
272,037
100
| PERFORMANCE MATRIX | VALUE | MONITORED AT |
|---|---|---|
| Gas Fee | 272,037 | November 12, 2024 5:00 AM |
| Write Speed | 1 | November 12, 2024 5:00 AM |
| Read Speed | 4,960 | November 12, 2024 5:00 AM |
FOUNDATION TOOLS
FOUNDATION TOOLS
The score represents the development support the protocol offers to developers in terms of tools and resources.
FOUNDATION TOOLS
DOCUMENTATION
DOCUMENTATION
he score is derived by considering the documentation support offered by the protocol to help developers better understand the protocol's ecosystem.
DOCUMENTATION
Exists
Exists
Exists
Exists
GRANT PROGRAM
GRANT PROGRAM
The score reflects the protocol's progressiveness in allocating funds to support the developers who are building on top of the blockchain.
GRANT PROGRAM
N/A
N/A
ADD-ONS
ADD-ONS
The score reflects how equipped is the protocol's ecosystem with add-on tools like code editors, IDEs and security
auditing tools.
ADD-ONS
THIRD PARTY SERVICES
THIRD PARTY SERVICES
The score reflects the protocol's ability to provide third-party services such as Oracle integration, API management, and cloud services.
THIRD PARTY SERVICES
PROTOCOL SUPPORT
PROTOCOL SUPPORT
It reflects how well the protocol's support system works in terms of communication tools, DAO rating, development community size, and stack exchange, among other things.
PROTOCOL SUPPORT
ADOPTION
ADOPTION
It indicates how widely the protocol has been adopted in the industry, taking into account aspects such as the
number of developers that are using it and the number of transactional values.
ADOPTION
2,592
180
1
100%
COMMUNITY
COMMUNITY
The score depicts the protocol's overall responsiveness toward its members in online communities like Discord,
Telegram, Slack, Linkedin, etc.
COMMUNITY
Overview
An efficient decentralized solution should be able to suffice three main components of blockchain technology, namely: scalability, security and decentralization; also known as the blockchain trilemma. Bitcoin for instance focuses on security and decentralization but is not preferable for fast confirmation speed to process the transactions, day-to-day asset transfer and trading.
Most importantly, the legacy financial systems whose processes take place in the back-end need fast block finality and high throughput.
To manage and monitor these problems fundamentally, Fantom is one of the robust protocols with a high-speed consensus mechanism that gives allows transactions to function at a fast speed without compromising on security and decentralization along with scalability.
About Fantom
Fantom network is a high-performance, EVM-compatible, scalable, secure and smart contract compatible platform. Its mainnet deployment, known as the Fantom Opera, is developed on the Fantom’s consensus algorithm Lachesis. This network is an asynchronous, leaderless and byzantine fault-tolerant (BFT) Layer 1 blockchain network.
It is one of the many blockchain networks designed to provide a substitute for Ethereum. Fantom aims to provide increased scalability and low transaction costs in comparison to Ethereum 1.0 iteration. One of the most unique attributes of the Fantom crypto platform is that its users can develop and deploy their independent networks by not relying completely on the Fantom’s core consensus layer. Every decentralized application built on Fantom can function on its own distinctive blockchain network.
Fantom’s architecture
Fantom has a modular architecture that gives permission for complete customization of blockchain networks in regards to the digital assets, with dynamic attributes altered as per the various use cases. It is a parent network that has various child networks within its architecture and ecosystem that hosts and regulates various dynamic dApps.
With aBFT and PoS consensus algorithm, Fantom’s operational efficiency is intact with high speed and the security also increases exponentially. It has various fundamental components like:
- Fantom mainnet: Opera
- Fantom staking
- FTM token
- fUSD stablecoin
- fSwap trading platform
- fLend liquidity pool
Fantom’s consensus algorithm
Fantom provides an increased level of security with the help of a leaderless Proof-of-Stake consensus algorithm to secure the blockchain network. It's Asynchronous BFT consensus named the Lachesis holds the potential to scale to various nodes worldwide in an open environment and permissionless way with a high level of decentralization. It does not function as per delegated Proof-of-Stake and has no such concept of any masternode on the network.
Key features of Fantom
- Open-source network
- Encourages ope-participation
- Has a network-based stablecoin: fUSD
- Smart contract capable
- Has a liquidity pool: fLend
- Modular architecture based on aBFT consensus with high scalability
Founder of Fantom
Michael Kong
Popular use cases of Fantom
- SpookySwap DEX
- ParaSwap DEX
- ChainPort cross-chain bridge
- Xpollinate cross-chain bridge
